ARE YOU
DRESSING FOR CHRIST OR THE WORLD?
What
is wrong with women wearing trousers? What is wrong with me showing my feminine
features to be admired? A woman need be attractive and fashionable! It is my
body! I can wear what I want! Am aware, mind your own business! Is your dress
fashion professing Godliness, as a Christian?
Feminine
modesty has been understood as being distinctive from its male counterpart in
every society since the dawn of history, even in places where God’s word has
never reached. Today’s feminist fashion was inaugurated and promoted by
liberal-minded people, particularly feminist agitators, intend on discarding
Christian traditions and altering peoples understanding of Christian values.
The skirt-trouser dichotomy has become established within all civilization,
including Christian culture, as one of the main differences between men and
women’s clothing. Only recently has this difference been obscured. If you walk down the street of any city or town, the proportion of women
wearing trousers to skirts is something “like” 10:1. The fashion has become so
institutionalised that some women can be said to 'live in trousers'. For nearly
6,000 years, women always wore long dresses, but only since the last 40 years
that a dress is suddenly "impractical" to wear. Formerly, women
performed a wide variety of jobs, including farming, in skirts. Nowadays, they
can't so much as rake a few leaves in the garden without feeling the need to
put on a pair of trousers.
Is
a Christian justified to wear what pleases him/ her?
Know this
Scripture
demanded purity in glances, thoughts, desires and actions and Christians
generally understood that immodesty is related to lust and causing temptation
to others. A moral conscience was therefore formed which informed Christians
that immodesty, particularly in a woman because of her nature as the temptress
of man, involves an offence against God and lack of respect for ourselves and
our neighbour. In non-Christian countries such as India and the Far East where
women wore trousers, they took care to cover them amply with a flowing robe or
a long tunic that concealed the outline of their body below the waist.
It
is evident that trousers were historically associated with men and wherever
they were adopted by women, they were subjected to skirting around by cultural
restrictions and limited to specific circumstances. There is thus no recorded
history of women adopting the fashion of wearing trousers like their men folk
until the 20th century. Know this, all
dictionaries up to early 20th century defined “trousers” as “a
garment worn by males”.
“You’ve forgotten your
skirt!”
Most
women and girls are incredibly naïve about the effects of immodesty; they
sincerely want to lead a Christian life, but seem to be unaware of the link
between a chaste heart, a chaste appearance and their potential for leading
others astray. There is no such thing as modest trousers on or for women. If
women are ‘dressing to kill’ these
days, there is no doubt that they have succeeded in killing the morals of men
and endangering their souls by wearing provocative styles, particularly
midriff-baring tops and how-low-you-can-go jeans. ...see part 2
No comments:
Post a Comment